ALL RIGHT RESERVED to Michael Hansmeyer Computational Architecture
hMR6kDirbNKmA4U9wS8BfpZXGzl0CJgQPonudc1H
izIgNFkABsuPHqT8Oy6x3fjQhSWo7YrDKbEG40Cm
Today, as I am still in this world of ease, it is a time where I can be carefree to the money, economy, and environment. It is truly a bless as I do have a mundane and stable job, in which provides me with time and energy to browse the web for different ideas and facts.
ZUVI4sxFHXimqLw5pbJY6TA8dDEyrRvlPCuG9320
JBZwQq0e3rjDdAoH7Ws9NPSt415YXKClvgTcRVx6
I watched a video on Michael Hansmeyer: Building unimaginable shapes.
oeENFJ9a7Q5dx3Uu4WmzObDkL6KIRCSPMwHtiAlf
CnL4Arfk1cg3K0SEHeRvMdjuXbm7O6oU2a9ywYJB
http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_hansmeyer_building_unimaginable_shapes.html
bcSl1UR3mjD7yfta8Bnuz5qoeCIWPH9gZXYwr4xE
有中文字幕可選
6KDv3MQc8d7izCTbUBNO9EPXqJ0HsGm5nuASlgeF
Db0cWohz3l2sNO7rqMLdAT5Iv81at4CnBgeF6uEm
It is interesting as the speaker has constantly imply that he did not hinder any of the process by simply let the algorithm of the computer software dictate the outcome of this adventure. However, on the other hand, we have to ask that is not the sole act of creating algorithm interference by itself. Furthermore, what is the guideline as to the end product of such algorithm; such as how many folds or degrees of folds should there be performed? I am simply argue that even until the date of the automation is several generation passed down the road, when the time machine is taken over, the newest and most genuine product would be as the same as the cube at the origin.
d0yOJzpEV7Gxk4qYCRbQNDaFmA2UwnZoMlutcI9i
w3AZueQGD6LV7h9yUREKHslI2bfrOomSjYqTnkCx
It is undeniable that the outcome column of Michael Hansmeyer is amazing in its craftsmanship and the artistic value. It provides the insight into the computer constructs that we have not able to imagine prior. In addition, the complexity of the technology would only push the architectural field into a greater and better production systems and management style. This organic generation through the computer aid process surpasses what most of the human capacity; even the building of great architect, such as Guadi can hardly compare to the complexity that a single column possessed.
M40aj8VsWwPRJA3fFIUHkxc15hygrmTpiCL2tnzo
gcZo2xMhIikKu4yOesJHCaE9AbrBPpV6Qn715Yj0
Yet, the most crucial question remained after the hype of the new tools and techniques. To what end are we doing all these for? As a person with not much money or status, I simply need a nice little house that I can comfortably lay down my head at night; a simple square column that I can nail my picture on. Does this imitation of nature an act of decoration or an act of innovation? I do not know; I am torn in between the advancement and excitement of the news in architecture, yet confuse if we have deviate from where we have started as to live with the nature and in harmonious relationship with our environment.
gJykLMXm12Z98oG0KAqtsNa65di7T4UbIClEHRwh
lphoezEnGvIH1bjQA8BsP7CtLiOxU3XMf2ckWduJ
cT2n0C14jVivQ3hPwfxBX8dMq5ugH6LopOKm7EIA
回應(0)